This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Find out more here

CLOSE

Publications

In an article written for Asian Dispute Review, Kate Parlett and Mark Tushingham draw attention to recent treaty practice in the Asia-Pacific region as a result of the rising number of investment claims against environmental protection measures enacted in the public interest by... Read full »

Andrew Dinsmore has published a further article in the Journal of International Banking and Financial Law entitled 'Cybersecurity litigation: jurisdiction, applicable law and class actions’, which considers the establishment of jurisdiction, the rules on applicable law to a... Read full »

Since the 2015 creation of the ASEAN Economic Community, there is a plan to establish, amongst other things, “effective competition regimes” in all ASEAN Member States, more specifically via the ASEAN Competition Action Plan 2025. This has led to a flurry of new legislation in ASEAN... Read full »

Carlos Sevilleja Garcia v Marex Financial Limited [2018] EWCA Civ.1468 David Lewis QC and Richard Greenberg report on a significant judgment concerning the rule against reflective loss (the “RL Rule”). The Court of Appeal has resolved the “as yet undecided question whether the [RL... Read full »

Nori Holdings Ltd & Others v Public Joint-Stock Company Bank Otkritie Financial Corporation [2018] EWHC 1343 (Comm) In an important and erudite new judgment, Mr Justice Males comprehensively dismantles Advocate General Wathelet’s opinion that West Tankers should no longer apply.... Read full »

What does the re-imposition of United States sanctions on Iran mean for business outside the US?  On one view, the US withdrawal from the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) changes very little. Although it was agreed under the JCPOA and enshrined in UN Security Council Resolution 2231... Read full »

Question 5 (of 5) for London arbitration following the Court of Appeal’s decision in Halliburton v Chubb­ The recent decision in Halliburton v Chubb is of great interest for its treatment of an application to remove an arbitrator under s 24 of the Arbitration Act 1996 in the common... Read full »

Question 4 (of 5) for London Arbitration following the Court of Appeal’s decision in Halliburton v Chubb The recent decision in Halliburton v Chubb is of great interest for its treatment of an application to remove an arbitrator under s 24 of the Arbitration Act 1996 in the common situation... Read full »

Members of 20 Essex Street have been instructed on a number of the largest international and domestic fraud cases in recent years and, as such, have extensive experience of bringing and defending substantial fraud claims. For further details on the set's experience in this area please view the... Read full »

Question 3 (of 5) for London arbitration following the Court of Appeal’s decision in Halliburton v Chubb The recent decision in Halliburton v Chubb is of great interest for its treatment of an application to remove an arbitrator under s 24 of the Arbitration Act 1996 in the common situation... Read full »